Navigation * Home
/ Solutions
/ Email Archiving
& Compliance / Use of email in court
Use of email in court proceedings
Electronic information is potentially admissible
before courts of law, although evidential weight is called into
play.
Email that is centrally managed and stored in a way
that cannot be tampered with improves its evidential weight. This
increases a company's chances of being able to use email evidence
offensively in litigation rather than being limited to having email
used against it.
Recent high profile fraud cases such as at Enron have hinged upon
proving who knew what, when, and have required the forensic investigation
of email history. More day-to-day court proceedings concerning harassment,
contract law etc. can also hinge on email evidence, which can be
used by or against the organisation.
In these circumstances it is in the organisation's interest to
be able to present a complete and accurate record of email discussions
which is 100% tamper-evident and easily searched by those with authority
to do so. Critically, if you can prove that 'email can't be shredded'
you can not only show that an email was sent, but also that it wasn't.
Interestingly, some organisations' initial response to this issue
is to be concerned that a compliance level email repository will
store evidence that might incriminate them, and therefore is somehow
a bad thing. However, more detailed thought usually leads responsible
organisations to the conclusion that corporate governance is essential
to a successful business. More than ever in the post-Enron world,
it is clear that if anyone is breaking the law within a company,
it is in the company's long term interest to be able to discover
it, stop it, and assist the authorities fully with any legal action
required. This in itself is naturally a deterrent against illegal
actions by employees and owners.
If you would like to contact a member of
our consultancy team today please either telephone or email;
Tel: +44 (0) 1622 618 752
Email: consultancy@bii-compliance.com
|